July 2024 / VIDEO
Growing pains and opportunity: Analyzing what's next in the AI boom
David Giroux explains why AI is likely to be deflationary over time and why he likes software.
Key Insights
- Excitement over artificial intelligence (AI) has created a great deal of market capitalization. It’s still early days for adoption of this disruptive technology.
- Adoption of advanced AI is likely to be deflationary in the intermediate term, as productivity gains could lead to higher unemployment.
- New features could enable some software companies to take share or increase prices, while using AI to aid software development could lower their costs.
Transcript
We are still really early in the AI story.
If you look at all the survey data you see from Fortune 1000 kind of CIOs, what are they doing from an AI perspective?
Right now, they're just, they're doing tests. They're doing beta analysis.
This all came on so quickly.
How do we deploy this to the benefit, and what's kind of the ROI?
We're really early days there.
The longer-term implication of this--maybe this even goes to the rates discussion—is, and we are going to have to deal with this as a civilization, as a country, as a world: This is going to destroy jobs.
And that will probably put that supply-demand imbalance for labor in a little bit more favorable position for an employer.
You're not just competing with, you know, two different people working for the same job but maybe with a computer option or a software option.
So I think that is actually deflationary long term because a lot of the productivity is coming from, you know, if you can get 20% productivity, 50% productivity, you don’t need as many workers.
And that might mean a structural increase in the unemployment rate and actually structural, a decline in the inflation rate, potentially. And that's just something that we're going to have to deal with.
I'm bullish on software companies around AI.
But what makes up software companies? It's mostly software engineers. That's the number one job at all these companies. But they don’t need as many software engineers as they had in the past. You can have a situation where these software companies are actually generating higher revenue growth because of AI, but they’re also benefiting because they need fewer software engineers to write the code than they did in the past.
So you can have a really nice situation where revenue growth is accelerating and margins are going the right way as well.
Important Information
This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.
The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.
Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.
The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request. It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.
USA—Issued in the USA by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD, 21202, which is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. For Institutional Investors only.
© 2024 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, and the Bighorn Sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
David Giroux is a portfolio manager for the Capital Appreciation Strategy, including the Capital Appreciation Fund and Capital Appreciation Equity ETF, and co-portfolio manager for the Capital Appreciation and Income Fund at T. Rowe Price Investment Management. He also is head of Investment Strategy and chief investment officer for T. Rowe Price Investment Management. David is the chairman of the Capital Appreciation and Capital Appreciation Equity ETF Investment Advisory Committees and a cochairman of the Capital Appreciation and Income Investment Advisory Committee. He is a member of the T. Rowe Price Investment Management ESG Investing Committee and the T. Rowe Price Investment Management Investment Steering Committee. David is a six-time nominee and two-time winner of Morningstar's Fund Manager of the Year award.1 His fund also has won 22 Best Fund awards2 from Lipper. David is a vice president of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
_________________________________
Call 1-800-638-7780 to request a prospectus, which includes risks, fees, expenses, and other information that you should read and consider carefully before investing.
All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of principal.
Past performance cannot guarantee future results.
1 Established in 1988, the Morningstar Fund Manager of the Year award recognizes portfolio managers who demonstrate excellent investment skill and the courage to differ from the consensus to benefit investors. The Fund Manager of the Year award winners are chosen based on research and in-depth qualitative evaluation by Morningstar's Manager Research Group. To qualify for the award, managers' funds must have not only posted impressive returns for the year, but the managers also must have a record of delivering outstanding long-term risk-adjusted performance and of aligning their interests with shareholders'. Managers' funds must currently have a Morningstar Analyst Rating™ of Gold or Silver. David Giroux won the award for Allocation Funds in 2012 and Allocation/Alternative Funds in 2017.
Morningstar's Manager Research Group consists of various wholly owned subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc., including, but not limited to, Morningstar Research Services LLC. Morningstar's Manager Research Group produces various ratings including the Morningstar Analyst Rating for funds and the Morningstar Quantitative Rating for funds. The Analyst Rating is derived from a qualitative assessment process performed by a manager research analyst, whereas the Morningstar Quantitative Rating uses a machine-learning model based on the decision-making processes of Morningstar's analysts, their past ratings decisions, and the data used to support those decisions. In both cases, the ratings are forward-looking assessments and include assumptions of future events, which may or may not occur or may differ significantly from what was assumed. The Analyst Ratings and Quantitative Ratings are statements of opinions, subject to change, are not to be considered as guarantees, and should not be used as the sole basis for investment decisions. This press release is for informational purposes only; references to securities should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the securities.
©2024 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
2 The Capital Appreciation Fund received the 2024 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 5-year and 10-year periods ended 12/31/2023, the 2023 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods ended 12/31/2022, the 2022 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2021, the 2021 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2020, the 2020 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2019, the 2019 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2018, the 2018 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2017, the 2017 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2016, the 2016 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods ended 12/31/2015, the 2015 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/14, the 2014 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2013, the 2013 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2012, the 2012 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2011, the 2011 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2010, the 2010 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 5-year and 10-year periods ended 12/31/2009, and the 2009 Lipper Fund Classification Award for Best Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Growth Fund over the 10-year period ended 12/31/2008.
Rankings for other periods differ. For Lipper Best Individual Funds, the calculation periods extend over 36, 60, and 120 months. The highest Lipper Leader for Consistent Return (Effective Return) value within each eligible classification determines the fund classification winner over 3, 5, or 10 years as of the period-end and no other time periods. Only one share class (the one with the best Lipper Leader score) is used for each portfolio in determining asset class and overall awards. A high Lipper rating does not necessarily imply that a fund had the best total performance or that the fund achieved positive results for that period. Lipper ratings and Lipper Fund Awards are not intended to predict future results. For a detailed explanation, please review the Lipper Leaders Methodology document on lipperfundawards.com/Methodology.
From Thomson Reuters Lipper Awards, © 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Used by permission and protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States. The printing, copying, redistribution, or retransmission of this Content without express written permission is prohibited.
T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.
