Skip to content
Search

October 2024 / VIDEO

The Fed’s big cut may favor high yield bonds

The Fed’s September rate cut reduced the risk of a recession. High yield bonds may benefit.

Key Insights

  • Historically, high yield bonds performed well after the first rate cut in a Federal Reserve easing cycle if that move was not followed by a recession.
  • The Fed’s large September cut improved the odds of avoiding a U.S. recession. Strong credit fundamentals and attractive yields are also supportive.

After a lengthy wait, the U.S. Federal Reserve began cutting interest rates in September. Many investors may be wondering how this could affect their fixed income allocations. 

Initially, at least, markets viewed the Fed’s first cut of 50 basis points (0.5 percentage point) as positive for the U.S. economic outlook. Longer-term yields, which are sensitive to changes in economic expectations, rose over the week following the Fed’s move. 

Historically, long-term investment-grade (IG) bonds have tended to be an excellent hedge against economic weakness but less attractive when the economy strengthens. High yield bonds, on the other hand, have tended to benefit from economic strength. This being the case, bond investors may want to consider the mix between IG and high yield bonds in their portfolios.

High yield performance after Fed cuts

On average, the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Index has returned 4.44% in the 18 months after the Fed has embarked on a rate-cutting cycle. But the range of outcomes has been very wide (Figure 1).

These results depended heavily on whether a recession occurred after the Fed’s initial cut. In three out of the four cases where a recession did occur in the next 18 months, high yield bonds produced negative double-digit returns. In the fourth case, after the Fed cut rates in August 2019, high yield bonds fell sharply once the COVID pandemic hit the U.S. economy six months later, but bounced back when that recession proved to be deep but very short.

High yield performance after the Fed’s first cut

(Fig. 1) Performance of Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Index over following 18 months

Fever line chart where lines represent 18-month cumulative returns on a high yield index after the first rate cut in a Federal Reserve easing cycle.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
*First Fed cut is defined as the first month in which the federal funds effective rate fell 0.25% below the trailing 12-month peak.
Sources: Bloomberg Finance L.P. T. Rowe Price analysis using data from FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved.

Results were much more encouraging when an initial Fed cut was not followed by a recession. In all three cases, high yield bonds provided positive returns. But those gains were relatively modest after the Fed starting cutting rates in 1998, and a U.S. recession eventually hit in 2001.

High yield fundamentals appear quite strong

On the bright side, several key metrics used to gauge the health of the high yield market remain high by historical standards. This is typically not the case before the onset of a recession.

Yields are attractive on a relative basis

(Fig. 2) Equity, fixed income, and cash yields*

Fever line chart showing that yields on U.S. high yield bonds are attractive relative to stocks even after expensive technology stocks are excluded.

January 2010 to August 2024.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
* Yields for the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Index, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, and Cash are yield to worst. Yields for the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 ex. Magnificent 7) are earnings yields.
The “Magnificent 7” are Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla. The specific securities identified and described are for informational purposes only and do not represent recommendations.Sources: Bloomberg Finance L.P. and Standard & Poor’s (see Additional Disclosure).

As of June, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) were almost five times interest expense in the high yield universe—below the recent peak of 5.77 but above the highest level reached from 2008 through 2020.1 

This was true even after we adjusted EBITDA for capital expenditures.  

Attractive yields versus equities

Lastly, high yield bonds now offer attractive yields—not only relative to other fixed income assets but to equities as well (Figure 2). At the end of August, the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Bond Index had a yield to worst2  of 7.3%, while the earnings yield for the S&P 500 Index was only 4.7%.

Even if we ignore the impact of the so-called Magnificent Seven technology stocks (which pull the S&P 500 earnings yield lower), high yield bonds still offer considerably more attractive levels of yield.

Conclusion

We believe the Fed’s recent dovish shift has increased the likelihood that a recession will be avoided over the near to medium term. If so, high yield bonds could prove more attractive than longer-term IG bonds over the next 18 months. As a result, our Asset Allocation Committee is maintaining an overweight position in high yield bonds.

Important Information

This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.

The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.

The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request. It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.

Canada—Issued in Canada by T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc.’s investment management services are only available to Accredited Investors as defined under National Instrument 45-106. T. Rowe Price (Canada), Inc. enters into written delegation agreements with affiliates to provide investment management services.

© 2024 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, and the Bighorn Sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Previous Article

October 2024 / EQUITY

Key considerations for global equities beyond the U.S. election
Next Article

October 2024 / FIXED INCOME

Could a 5% 10-year Treasury yield be around the corner?
202309-3881466