Ahead of the Curve
Could a 5% 10-year Treasury yield be around the corner?

Market consensus expects the yield on the 10‑year U.S. Treasury note to decrease with the Federal Reserve (Fed) kicking off a rate-cutting cycle. But could a combination of factors—not least fiscal largesse in a U.S. election year—push the 10‑year Treasury yield up from its near 3.80% level in early October?

I think that the 10‑year Treasury yield will test the 5.0% threshold in the next six months, steepening the yield curve. There are three dynamics at play:

1. Fed rate cuts could limit yield increases on short‑maturity Treasury bills.

2. Ongoing issuance by the Treasury to fund the government’s deficit spending is flooding the market with new supply.

3. The Fed’s quantitative tightening has taken a large, reliable buyer of Treasuries out of the market, further skewing the balance of supply and demand in favor of higher yields.

The term premium, which measures the amount by which the yield on a longer‑dated Treasury note exceeds the expected average yield on a series of Treasury bills rolled over at maturity, has been moving higher. The growing imbalance between Treasury supply and demand is contributing to a higher term premium on 10‑year notes. Long‑term inflation expectations are beginning to increase, which is also helping to push term premiums higher.

Breakeven inflation rates¹ are the best measure of market‑implied inflation forecasts. On September 20, the day after the Fed’s rate cut, 10‑year inflation breakevens jumped around seven to eight basis points² higher, likely in response to the size of the rate cut. After the previous two inflation breakeven moves of that magnitude, the nominal³ 10‑year Treasury yield increased by about 100 basis points within three months. This pattern indicates that inflation expectations could likely contribute to a higher 10‑year term premium over the next few months.

I see three possible scenarios for the U.S. economy and the Fed over the next 12 months. There is some overlap between these and what I outlined in “Three Fed scenarios, same result: higher yields, steeper curves” in May, though I’ve replaced the “no Fed rate cuts” outcome with a recession scenario.

1. Midcycle adjustment

China injects more stimulus into its economy, providing a boost to global growth. The cloud of uncertainty around the U.S. election clears up quickly, allowing the Fed to make its rate cuts relatively shallow (like the 1995–1998 midcycle adjustment). I believe this is the highest‑probability scenario of the three.

2. Normal easing cycle

The Fed reduces rates to near neutral, which is probably around 3%. This would steepen the two‑year to 10‑year Treasury yield curve, driving it to a positive slope⁴ of an estimated 100 basis points that would be more in line with historical norms.

3. Recession

The U.S. economy enters a recession. This environment would force the Fed to aggressively ease monetary policy, possibly cutting rates back to the near‑zero levels that followed the global financial crisis of 2008–2009 and the onset of the pandemic in 2020.

I believe the second and third scenarios have approximately equal probabilities, with both less likely than the midcycle adjustment.

The 10‑year Treasury yield’s fastest path to 5% would be in the scenario that features shallow Fed rate cuts. My forecast could also pan out in an environment where the Fed eases enough to get the federal funds rate close to neutral, though in that scenario it might take longer for the 10‑year yield to hit the 5% level. However, if the U.S. economy descends into a recession, a 5% 10‑year Treasury note would be completely off the table as the Fed would need to aggressively ease policy.

Investors sharing my view that a near‑term recession is unlikely should consider positioning for higher long‑term Treasury yields.

So does the combination of low recession probability and my outlook for a meaningful increase in the 10‑year yield mean that the Fed’s 50-basis-point cut in September was the start of a policy error? Not exactly. Even if there was 75 basis points of easing before the end of 2024, the fed funds rate would still be well above the neutral rate. The Fed’s reaction to slowing inflation and a gradually weakening labor market has been on target so far, but it will need to stay nimble and not ease too much in 2025.

T. Rowe Price cautions that economic estimates and forward‑looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, which change over time. Actual outcomes could differ materially from those anticipated in estimates and forward‑looking statements, and future results could differ materially from historical performance. The information presented herein is shown for illustrative, informational purposes only. Any historical data used as a basis for analysis are based on information gathered by T. Rowe Price and from third‑party sources and have not been verified. Forecasts are based on subjective estimates about market environments that may never occur. Any forward‑looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. T. Rowe Price assumes no duty to, and does not undertake to, update forward‑looking statements.