asset allocation  |  january 10, 2025

Bringing a tested investment process to a wider market

Capital Appreciation and Income Fund one-year reflections.

 

Key Insights

  • David Giroux and Farris Shuggi marked their first anniversary of managing the T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund.

  • Amid an unpredictable market, the team remained committed to its disciplined investment process and a tilt toward growth at a reasonable price (GARP) and quality.

  • Giroux and Shuggi’s research process combines fundamental and quantitative analysis to construct a higher‑quality portfolio with a long‑term orientation.

David Giroux, CFA

Co-portfolio Manager, Capital Appreciation and Income Fund, Head of Investment Strategy and Chief Investment Officer, T. Rowe Price Investment Management

Farris Shuggi, CFA

Co-portfolio Manager, Capital Appreciation and Income Fund, Head of Quantitative Equity, T. Rowe Price Investment Management

The Capital Appreciation and Income Fund (CAFI) incepted on November 29, 2023, reaching its one‑year anniversary on November 29, 2024. The fund seeks to generate attractive current income and limit losses while also aiming to generate long‑term capital growth. The fund employs a bottom‑up approach to security selection that yields a portfolio with a quality bias that is diversified1 across and within asset classes.

In this Q&A, Co-portfolio Managers David Giroux and Farris Shuggi reflect on their first year managing the Capital Appreciation and Income Fund.

The Capital Appreciation and Income Fund incepted at the tail end of a very strong year for U.S. equities. Throughout 2024, markets have continued to soar to fresh records. What’s driven the market’s advance, and how are you navigating this environment?

In 2023, markets really soared for two reasons: artificial intelligence and a total reversal in the macroeconomic and stock market consensus. It’s hard to believe now, but entering 2023, almost every economist, strategist, investor, and CEO seemed to think that we were destined to go into a recession. At the start of 2023, growth stocks were dead and it was a new regime in which a recession was inevitable. By the end of 2023, growth stocks were back in vogue and the consensus had reversed. Corporate earnings had remained strong and inflation pressures had receded, and the pendulum of market expectations swung hard away from a recession and heavily favored a soft landing and imminent cuts.

Looking at the last 12 months within the S&P 500, momentum, growth, and high beta names have been the greatest beneficiaries of the runup in markets. Tech and communication services have led the way, nearly doubling the returns of the broader index. While traditionally defensive sectors like utilities and health care generated strong double‑digit returns over the period, they lagged in this risk‑on market. This environment wasn’t particularly favorable for our fund, which is focused on delivering income while limiting potential losses. When enthusiasm wavers and an emphasis on corporate fundamentals comes back into focus, we are confident that our long‑established process, philosophy, and framework will work in our favor.

As portfolio managers, it is really hard to invest against the grain. It is really hard to buy cyclicals when everyone says we are going into a recession. It is really hard to buy utilities when everyone thinks rates are going higher. It is really hard to buy stocks as they are going down every day, and it is just as hard to sit out a rally when we see the underpinnings are shaky. However, we believe this is one of the greatest market inefficiencies that we can exploit. Time and time again, by taking a longer view than the market, by focusing on trying to maximize returns over the next five years as opposed to the next five minutes, five hours, or five days, we aim to create shareholder value by investing against the macroeconomic consensus.

Performance table

(Fig. 1)

Performance table

Cumulative

    12/31/2023–12/31/2024 Since Inception–12/31/2024
Capital Appreciation and Income Fund NAV 9.04% 12.47%
Custom Benchmark-60% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index/40% S&P 500 Index   10.29 14.77
Morningstar Peer Category: U.S. Moderately Conservative Allocation Average   7.72 12.06

As of December 31, 2024.
Figures shown in U.S. dollars.
Fund Inception Date is November 29, 2023.
The fund’s total return figures reflect the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, if any. The fund(s) may have other share classes available that offer different investment minimums and fees. See the prospectus for details.
Performance data quoted represent past performance and do not guarantee future results; current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Investment returns and principal value will fluctuate and shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. To obtain the most recent month‑end performance, visit troweprice.com. The fund’s gross and net expense ratios as reported in the most recent prospectuses were 0.88% and 0.65%, respectively. The Fund operates under a contractual expense limitation that expires on April 30, 2025.

The Capital Appreciation and Income Fund invests in a larger number of companies than the Capital Appreciation Fund, which David also manages. How do you arrive at the fund’s investment universe, and what accounts for the difference between the two?

One thing we would highlight up front is that the equity investment universe for CAFI is actually not materially different from that of the Capital Appreciation Fund. CAFI employs the same time‑tested investment philosophy and process and rigorous approach to security selection and portfolio construction as the Capital Appreciation Fund, favoring companies that the team deems as having superior capital allocation, strong management teams, and reasonable valuations. Both portfolios have a quality tilt, are significantly overweight GARP, and are filled with names that offer the potential for attractive risk‑adjusted returns.

One key difference with respect to CAFI is that we add quantitative overlays to help construct a portfolio that seeks to deliver higher income and manage risk by helping to highlight some of the fundamental characteristics of individual companies. For the Capital Appreciation Fund, our investment framework yields a fairly concentrated equity allocation of 50 to 70 names. For the Capital Appreciation and Income Fund, the fund’s lower risk profile encourages a more diversified equity allocation of about 100 names.2

The Capital Appreciation suite has really grown in the past year as well. You launched not only the exchange‑traded fund (ETF), but also the Capital Appreciation and Income Fund shortly thereafter. What’s changed since you started managing these additional strategies?

When we think about the Capital Appreciation Fund, we think it’s a highly differentiated strategy that has historically delivered on its objectives over the long term to the benefit of our investors. We’ve always thought about delivering new strategies that could have a positive impact for different segments of investors, with two clear caveats:

  • Any new strategy couldn’t hurt the Capital Appreciation Fund or its shareholders in any way.

  • Any new strategy would need to be a highly differentiated portfolio that solves a problem in a way that lets it clearly stand out in the market.

Our Capital Appreciation and Income Fund is designed for investors who may value an emphasis on income generation and capital preservation—such as investors who are approaching or are in retirement—without sacrificing the potential for long-term capital appreciation. CAFI is our solution‑oriented approach to providing attractive income, particularly as lifetime income3 becomes a growing priority for many investors.

On the other side, for the Capital Appreciation Equity ETF, managed by David Giroux, we think we’ve built a portfolio that may be a good option for investors looking for U.S. large‑cap exposure. Our value proposition is seeking to outperform the S&P 500 Index with less risk and better tax efficiency than S&P 500 Index ETFs, and we think that’s a really compelling opportunity. Our ETF addresses a need for investors looking for higher equity exposure.

Early indications are that the needs for these funds are real. In the year since we launched the ETF, we’ve seen really incredible flows and interest, which helped propel assets under management to more than USD 2.9 billion dollars.4 That growth has made it the fastest‑growing ETF that T. Rowe Price has ever offered. When we look at the suite now, we’re excited to be able to bring our experience and investment capabilities to a much wider spectrum of investors than we had with the Capital Appreciation Fund alone.

Has expanding your offerings been a challenge for the team?

We’ve actually found the opposite to be the case. We mentioned before that one of our key requirements for new strategies was to do no harm to the Capital Appreciation Fund and its investors. What we’ve found is that introducing these new strategies has been additive for our process and investment professionals across each portfolio.

Part of our long‑standing investment process has been to devote significant time and energy to deep dives into specific industries or strategic opportunities for our portfolio. Some recent examples include the deep dives we did to try to understand the impact of the COVID‑19 pandemic in early 2020 or, more recently, to evaluate the impact and potential of AI. Now, when we dedicate that time for one strategy, whether it be the Capital Appreciation Fund or the ETF or the Capital Appreciation and Income Fund, the analysis our research yields can benefit both of the other strategies as well.

The investments that we’ve made in our team, whether it be adding associate portfolio managers and dedicated analysts or building out our research platform and capabilities, have brought us to a place where we are better resourced than ever. The daily collaboration across the team has helped us sharpen our ideas and enhance our research and analysis in ways that we think make each portfolio stronger on its own and each of us as investment professionals better collectively.

Looking ahead, are there any areas of the market where you are seeing particular opportunities or challenges over the next couple of years?

We really like the utilities sector over the long term. Utilities companies are, in our view, structurally undervalued relative to the S&P 500. Several sector names have been able to grow their earnings faster than they have traditionally while still also offering attractive dividend yields. These companies don’t face pressure from foreign currency risk or international exposure, they don’t have secular risks that we see in other market segments like consumer staples or legacy tech, and we believe several have a strong environmental, social, and governance (ESG) tailwind from their investments in grid modernization and shift to renewable energy. We also think utilities could be among the second derivative winners from artificial intelligence (AI). The energy demand for graphics processing units (GPUs) to power AI is substantial, and growing adoption across a range of industries could meaningfully increase usage and revenue for utilities.

Within the Capital Appreciation and Income Fund’s fixed income allocation, we hold a healthy mix of U.S. Treasuries, high-quality BB and BBB bonds,5 and bank loans. Looking at the current environment, we think BB and high‑quality bank loans create a compelling opportunity to generate equity-like returns while taking on less risk than the broader equity market.

Taking a broader view, valuations are stretched across substantial portions of the market. With a bit more policy uncertainty and elevated earnings expectations, we could see a pickup in volatility in the year ahead, especially as markets become more reactive and focused on the very short term. We think volatility creates opportunities for disciplined investors who are able to cut through noise and focus on fundamentals, and we think this would be an environment that would work in our favor.

Against today’s unpredictable backdrop, what gives you confidence that you can deliver on the fund’s investment objectives?

We are playing a fundamentally different game than the market and our competitors. So much capital is focused on returns and performance over the short term, and you see vast sums chasing momentum and trends. On the other hand, we’re focused on meeting our goals and delivering performance over the long term, which allows us to stay focused on fundamental research, follow our analysis, and scrutinize every dollar we invest. We think this imbalance in objectives in the market creates a durable opportunity for investors with a long‑term orientation to outperform over time.

We have a strong team of experienced investment professionals and a great culture on our team. Being contrarian is part of the DNA of the Capital Appreciation team, and that plays out in our collaboration every day. There are no yes‑men or yes‑women on our team. Every person is committed to doing the research and analysis to come to the strongest possible ideas, and we aren’t afraid to challenge ourselves or each other to do that.

And lastly, we’d say we have a really strong process that was developed and refined for years over the existence of the Capital Appreciation Fund. And that’s laid a firm foundation for everything we do for the Capital Appreciation and Income Fund and the Capital Appreciation Equity ETF. We’re focused on identifying and exploiting durable market efficiencies in pursuit of our investment objectives, and that commitment holds true no matter how markets shift over the short term.

Call 1-800-225-5132 to request a prospectus or summary prospectus; each includes investment objectives, risks, fees, expenses, and other information you should read and consider carefully before investing.

1Diversification cannot assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market.
2The actual number of holdings within the fund may fluctuate over time.
3Income is not guaranteed.
4As of December 13, 2024.
5Credit ratings for the securities held in the portfolio are provided by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch. A rating of “AAA” represents the highest-rated securities, and a rating of “D” represents the lowest-rated securities with a rating of “BBB” being the lowest investment-grade rating and “BB” being the highest non-investment-grade rating. If a rating is not available, the security is classified as Not Rated. The rating of the underlying investment vehicle is used to determine the creditworthiness of securities. The portfolio is not rated by any agency. T. Rowe Price does not evaluate these ratings but simply assigns them to the appropriate credit quality category as determined by the rating agency.

For a glossary of financial terms, please visit: https://www.troweprice.com/en/us/glossary.

Additional Disclosure

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

S&P, Bloomberg and Morningstar do not accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the indexes or data, and hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose. No party may rely on any indexes or data contained in this communication. Visit https://www.troweprice.com/en/us/market-data-disclosures for additional legal notices & disclaimers.

Important Information

This material is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be investment advice or a recommendation to take any particular investment action. Investors should seek independent legal and financial advice, including advice as to tax consequences, before making any investment decision.

The views contained herein are those of the authors as of January 2025 and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price associates.

ETFs are bought and sold at market prices, not net asset value (NAV). Investors generally incur the cost of the spread between the prices at which shares are bought and sold. Buying and selling shares may result in brokerage commissions, which will reduce returns.

The T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund, Capital Appreciation and Income Fund and Capital Appreciation Equity ETF share the same lead portfolio manager and investment research process. However, the funds’ implementation of the research process varies including, but not limited to, differences in product structure, asset allocation, trading, and fees and expenses. There is no guarantee that the funds will perform similarly in any market environment. Review the prospectuses for detailed information on the funds’ strategy, fees, and risks.

Risks: All investments are subject to risks, including the possible loss of principal. Capital Appreciation Equity ETF: The ETF is subject to the inherent volatility of common stock investing. The fund’s value and growth investing styles may become out of favor, which may result in periods of underperformance. The fund is “nondiversified,” meaning it may invest a greater portion of its assets in a single company and own more of the company’ voting securities than is permissible for a “diversified” fund. The fund’s share price can be expected to fluctuate more than that of a comparable diversified fund. Capital Appreciation Fund: The fund is subject to the inherent volatility of common stock investing. The value approach carries the risk that the market will not recognize a security’s intrinsic value for a long time or that a stock judged to be undervalued may actually be appropriately priced. Because of the fund’s fixed‑income holdings or cash position, it may not keep pace in a rapidly rising market. Capital Appreciation and Income Fund: The fund is subject to the inherent volatility of common stock investing. Fixed‑income securities are subject to credit risk, liquidity risk, call risk, and interest‑rate risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices generally fall.

Investments in high-yield bonds involve greater risk of price volatility, illiquidity, and default than higher-rated debt securities. Investments in bank loans may at times become difficult to value and highly illiquid; they are subject to credit risk such as nonpayment of principal or interest, and risks of bankruptcy and insolvency. The utilities industries can be significantly affected by government regulation, financing difficulties, supply and demand of services or fuel, and natural resource conservation. They are subject to interest rate risk (higher interest rates have typically pressured utilities because they reduce the present value of future dividends and bond yields also typically become more competitive with the dividend yields offered by the stocks).

This information is not intended to reflect a current or past recommendation concerning investments, investment strategies, or account types, advice of any kind, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities or investment services. The opinions and commentary provided do not take into account the investment objectives or financial situation of any particular investor or class of investor. Please consider your own circumstances before making an investment decision.

Information contained herein is based upon sources we consider to be reliable; we do not, however, guarantee its accuracy. Actual future outcomes may differ materially from any estimates or forward‑looking statements provided.

Past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. All investments are subject to market risk, including the possible loss of principal. All charts and tables are shown for illustrative purposes only.

202412-4072730

 

Next Steps

  • Get strategies and tips for today’s market conditions.

  • Contact a Financial Consultant at 1-800-401-1819.