Skip to content
Search

January 2023 / Arif Perspectives

Attractive yields but narrow spreads: The credit dilemma

From the Field

Could we be entering the zone of a global monetary policy mistake? Recent hawkish stances taken by some major developed market central banks make this a valid question. There is now a meaningful risk that these central banks could overtighten in their quest to quell inflation and help push the global economy into recession as well as induce a financial market recession. China’s central bank, on the other hand, may be making a different type of policy error by not easing policy enough to support the country’s economy.

European Central Bank (ECB)

The ECB provided what is probably the most obvious recent example of an extremely hawkish position from a major central bank. At its June meeting, the ECB raised rates by 25 basis points (bp) and President Christine Lagarde said to expect another hike in July. Most significantly, it surprised the markets by raising its 2025 inflation forecast—consensus expectations had been for a decrease in the inflation outlook, so the increase sent a strong hawkish signal.
As a result of this revised forecast for higher inflation, we think the ECB could even hike again at its next meeting in September. However, like most central banks, the ECB does not have a strong track record for accurately predicting inflation, so there’s a distinct possibility that inflation will be lower than forecast—resulting in overtightening of monetary policy.

Federal Reserve Bank (Fed)

Although the Fed kept rates steady at its June policy meeting following 10 consecutive increases totaling 500 bp, the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) showed that policymakers expect to raise rates twice more in 2023. Fed Chair Jerome Powell underscored the Fed’s seemingly muscular approach to taming inflation by declaring that rate cuts are unlikely for a couple of years. This may have been part of an effort to convince markets not to price in cuts this year, and it worked—futures contracts post‑Fed meeting showed rate decreases starting in early 2024. However, Powell’s comment about not expecting cuts until 2025 was at odds with the SEP’s projections, which showed 100 bp of easing in 2024.
The Fed indicated that it will take into account the cumulative effects of policy tightening when determining how much more to raise rates, signaling that it is likely to take more time between hikes. But will that prove adequate to forestall a recession? The stickiness of core U.S. inflation and the Fed’s focus on returning inflation to its 2% target could easily lead the Fed to move rates too high and be slow to cut when the economy enters recession.

Bank of England (BoE)

The BoE seemed to be on the right side of change when it became one of the first major developed market central banks to raise rates following the 2020 economic bounce back from the pandemic‑induced recession. However, it then adopted a “don’t worry, inflation will come down” stance through much of 2022. As a result, it fell behind the curve in inflation fighting, and headline UK consumer price inflation spiked to well over 10%.
Now public sector workers in the UK are demanding massive pay increases, raising fears that a wage‑price spiral may be setting in. In response, the BoE surprised markets with a larger‑than‑expected 50 bp hike to 5% at its June meeting, leading to expectations that its terminal rate for this cycle will be 6%. Mortgage rates could reach 8%, which would crush consumer spending in a country where fixed rate mortgages are rare. Pressured by this environment of still‑hot inflation, the BoE could easily raise rates to a level that would push the economy into recession.

People’s Bank of China (PBOC)

Of course, central bank policy errors can take different forms. Instead of raising rates too far, China may not be cutting them aggressively enough to sustain its economic growth. The PBOC lowered its policy rate on one‑year medium-term lending facility loans by a paltry 10 bp earlier in June, its first cut since August 2022. While it followed with minor cuts on the one‑ and five‑year loan prime rates, China’s economy is plainly faltering after a post‑zero‑COVID‑policy bump, and it could have difficulty achieving even the relatively modest 5% annual growth target that the government set for 2023.
But China is an anomaly in a world of many developed‑market central banks striving to contain inflation. By extending their hiking cycles amid sticky inflation, these central banks could be creating more economic pain down the line. In contrast, some emerging market central banks are successfully bringing inflation down after moving more quickly and meaningfully to raise rates. The central banks of countries such as Brazil are now considering rate cuts, leading us to question whether the local currency bonds of these nations are priced with an excessive risk premium—and whether developed market sovereigns have enough risk premium.

 

 

Sign up to receive updates each time Arif releases a new perspective. 

 

By providing your contact information and ticking the box below, you agree to subscribe to receive information from T. Rowe Price about its products and strategies as listed above by email or post. For information about how T. Rowe Price processes your personal data, please see the T. Rowe Price privacy notice.

Open

Audience for the document: Share Class: Language of the document:
Open Cancel

Download

Share Class: Language of the document:
Download Cancel
Sign in to manage subscriptions for products, insights and email updates.
Continue with sign in?
To complete sign in and be redirected to your registered country, please select continue. Select cancel to remain on the current site.
Continue Cancel
Once registered, you'll be able to start subscribing.

Change Details

If you need to change your email address please contact us.
Subscriptions
OK
You are ready to start subscribing.
Get started by going to our products or insights section to follow what you're interested in.

Products Insights

GIPS® Information

T. Rowe Price ("TRP") claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has prepared and presented this report in compliance with the GIPS standards. T. Rowe Price has been independently verified for the 27-year period ended June 30, 2023, by KPMG LLP. The verification report is available upon request. A firm that claims compliance with the GIPS standards must establish policies and procedures for complying with all the applicable requirements of the GIPS standards. Verification provides assurance on whether the firm’s policies and procedures related to composite and pooled fund maintenance, as well as the calculation, presentation, and distribution of performance, have been designed in compliance with the GIPS standards and have been implemented on a firm-wide basis. Verification does not provide assurance on the accuracy of any specific performance report.

TRP is a U.S. investment management firm with various investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, and other regulatory bodies in various countries and holds itself out as such to potential clients for GIPS purposes. TRP further defines itself under GIPS as a discretionary investment manager providing services primarily to institutional clients with regard to various mandates, which include U.S, international, and global strategies but excluding the services of the Private Asset Management group.

A complete list and description of all of the Firm's composites and/or a presentation that adheres to the GIPS® standards are available upon request. Additional information regarding the firm's policies and procedures for calculating and reporting performance results is available upon request

Other Literature

You have successfully subscribed.

Notify me by email when
regular data and commentary is available
exceptional commentary is available
new articles become available

Thank you for your continued interest