Higher Tax Rates Expected in Biden Administration
Rise in corporate and personal taxes to finance domestic programs.
Former Vice President Joseph Biden will inherit an economy beleaguered by the battle against the coronavirus if he wins the election in November. The recession will influence his legislative priorities in both the short and long term; however, Biden has indicated that he would raise an array of corporate and personal taxes to finance domestic programs, including Social Security, health care, green energy, and infrastructure projects.
Corporate Taxes: Higher Rates and Closed Loopholes
Biden’s tax plan would restore many provisions of the tax code in effect prior to passage of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), netting approximately USD 3.8 trillion in new federal revenue over 10 years. The corporate rate would rise to 28% from 21%, still below the 35% pre‑TCJA rate. The administration would seek to double the tax on Global Intangible Low‑Taxed Income, or GILTI, which would bring the total rate up to 21%—affecting companies that generate offshore profits and benefit from tax arbitrage.
Biden’s tax plan would restore many provisions of the tax code in effect prior to passage of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act...
Biden’s plan also includes a minimum tax on corporate income, which would affect businesses with book profits of USD 100 million or higher. The tax is structured as an alternative minimum tax, in which corporations would pay the greater of their regular corporate income tax rate or the 15% minimum rate. Businesses would still be permitted to deduct net operating losses (NOLs) and receive foreign tax credits.
There is still uncertainty regarding how many of these tax proposals would become law, or whether Biden might modify them given the global recession and legislative compromise.
Personal Income: Plan Would Target Wealthiest
Biden’s individual tax plans primarily target both the highest‑income earners and those who derive their income from investments. The Biden plan would revert tax rates to the pre‑TCJA rate of 39.6%, affecting earned income above USD 400,000. The plan would implement a 12.4% Social Security payroll tax on earned income above USD 400,000, split evenly between employers and employees in order to fortify the Social Security system and increase benefits for retirees at lower income levels.
Biden would also phase out the 20% qualified business income deduction (including qualified real estate investment trust dividends) for filers with taxable income above USD 400,000, and cap itemized deductions to 28% of value—mostly affecting those in the top tax brackets.
The Biden campaign’s wish list also includes plans to increase taxes on long‑term capital gains and qualified dividends. Here, too, the greatest impact would fall on the wealthiest taxpayers.
Additionally, Biden would eliminate the step‑up in cost basis for assets left via inheritance. Currently, the cost basis steps up to the value of the asset at the time of the donor’s death. If this proposal were enacted, the inheritor would retain the donor’s original and presumably lower cost basis—generating a larger capital gain if the assets were sold.
Potential Impact of Proposed Tax Changes
David Giroux, T. Rowe Price CIO of Equity and Multi‑Asset and head of investment strategy, estimates the rate increases would collectively reduce S&P 500 company profits by 9% to 11%. However, some industries could benefit from increased spending, and we believe that a few sectors and companies may see fewer adverse effects.
9% to 11%
Potential cut in S&P 500 profits from proposed hike in corporate tax rates.
An increase in tax rates would have less impact on earnings per share for utilities because taxes are passed on to customers. Energy exploration and production companies generally pay relatively less in cash taxes and so would benefit relative to other sectors. But these companies could be subject to the minimum tax rate provision, which would put pressure on utilities’ customer bills and rate base growth while potentially affecting energy companies in a higher‑price environment.
Non-U.S.-domiciled companies would also escape a higher GILTI rate, since the provision only applies to U.S. companies—though only 2.9% of the S&P 500 is domiciled overseas.
Some High Hurdles to Passage
Whether such tax proposals are enacted hinges heavily on the outcome of Senate elections. Democratic control will be critical in determining not only how much of Biden’s legislative agenda would become law, but also the degree to which his priorities may have to shift to bring Republicans to the table. A tighter margin in the Senate means that more controversial provisions, like the corporate minimum tax, would be more difficult to accomplish.
The two most important factors in projecting the trajectory of Biden’s legislative agenda will be the state of economic recovery and the coronavirus, especially early in 2021.
The two most important factors in projecting the trajectory of Biden’s legislative agenda will be the state of economic recovery and the coronavirus, especially early in 2021. Were the country to continue to experience widespread spikes in infections amid social distancing, the path to recovery would be even more difficult to discern. A higher risk of crisis would make another deficit‑funded stimulus bill more attractive, resulting in the delay of tax rate increases until the economy is on more stable footing.
Important Information
This material is being furnished for general informational and/or marketing purposes only. The material does not constitute or undertake to give advice of any nature, including fiduciary investment advice, nor is it intended to serve as the primary basis for an investment decision. Prospective investors are recommended to seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of an investment and any income from it can go down as well as up. Investors may get back less than the amount invested.
The material does not constitute a distribution, an offer, an invitation, a personal or general recommendation or solicitation to sell or buy any securities in any jurisdiction or to conduct any particular investment activity. The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction.
Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed to be reliable and current; however, we cannot guarantee the sources’ accuracy or completeness. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. The views contained herein are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.
The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request. It is not intended for distribution to retail investors in any jurisdiction.
EEA ex-UK—Unless indicated otherwise this material is issued and approved by T. Rowe Price (Luxembourg) Management S.à r.l. 35 Boulevard du Prince Henri L-1724 Luxembourg which is authorised and regulated by the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. For Professional Clients only.
Switzerland—Issued in Switzerland by T. Rowe Price (Switzerland) GmbH, Talstrasse 65, 6th Floor, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland. For Qualified Investors only.
UK—This material is issued and approved by T. Rowe Price International Ltd, 60 Queen Victoria Street, London, EC4N 4TZ which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority. For Professional Clients only.
202007-1231212