December 2024, From the Field
In our view, the Politburo meeting on September 26 signaled a clear change with respect to China’s policy priorities. Since 2021, financial deleveraging and austerity were the primary agenda. However, facing weakening demand and a slowing economy, there is now a clear sense of urgency to support growth. We think a policy turning point was reached with the Politburo’s strong rhetoric about the economy, the call to reverse the property sector decline, and the flurry of expansionary policies that followed.
The first set of announcements from the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and other financial regulators were centered on monetary policy easing, including interest rate cuts, a reduction in the required reserve ratio for banks, lowering the cost for existing mortgages, and targeted support for the equity market. Subsequently, the Ministry of Finance came out with announcements regarding fiscal support, with the initial priorities being local government debt, property destocking, and increased spending on the safety net for low‑income groups.
The market is currently laser‑focused on the specific size of the fiscal budget. We believe the directional change is what matters. With the strong commitment to support growth, we may now have the “policy put” in place. More support is likely to come if the initial phases prove to be insufficient. In addition, with the clear message from Beijing, the local governments’ mentality will shift. This will create a more favorable policy environment at the local and execution levels.
China’s economic recovery since the COVID reopening has disappointed. While there are structural challenges, we believe that the deleveraging cycle since 2021 was the dominant factor accounting for the weakness. The agenda was to address the overinvestment and overpricing in the property sector. From the peak in 2020, the price of secondary homes declined 30%, primary sales volume more than halved, and new housing starts declined by over 70%. The negative impact on the Chinese economy was significant, though the worst might be behind us. With China’s property investment as share of total investment normalizing to around 9% to 10% (around the average for developed market economies), the industry is now on a more sustainable footing than it was three or four years ago (Figure 1).
As of August 31, 2024.
YoY = Year‑over‑year; bn sqm GFA = billion square metres gross floor area.
E = Estimates. Actual future outcomes may differ materially from estimates.
Source: Citi Research.
China’s property slump resulted in the deterioration of another ongoing chronic problem—local government debt. Land finance was close to 40% of local government revenues in 2020. However, this revenue source has since declined by over 40% (Figure 2). The result of this is a declining willingness by local government to invest, an austerity mentality taking hold, and a less friendly business environment.
To better understand the current trajectory, it would be helpful to review the last deleveraging cycle in 2011–2015. China’s huge stimulus in response to the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2008 led to significant overinvestment in infrastructure and overcapacity in upstream industries. A weak producer price index (PPI) was a symptom of that cycle, with the annual change in the PPI in negative territory for four consecutive years. On the other hand, consumption spending was holding up quite well back then. This round of deleveraging since 2021 is different. It had a significant impact on the property sector supply chain and a negative wealth effect on households. The symptom is weak consumption and deflation pressure (Figure 3).
As of July 2024.
RMB trn = Renminbi trillion.
Revenue in 2024 is estimated using realized revenue growth in July year‑to‑date.
Actual outcomes may differ materially from estimates. Estimates are subject to change.
Sources: Wind, Nomura Global Economics.
As of September 2024.
As of June 2024.
YoY = Year‑Over‑Year.
Grey shaded areas equal sustained periods of weak consumption and PPI deflation pressure.
Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P.
Recent policy announcements directly target the weak links in the Chinese economy of property, local government debt, and consumption. We expect these initiatives to stop the negative feedback loop and put the economy back on a stable path over the coming quarters.
The near‑term policies focus on the imminent challenges of property and local government debt. However, China also needs new drivers to sustain high‑quality growth over the mid‑ to long term. We expect a gradual shift away from traditional fixed asset investment‑driven growth.
Over the past three decades, China has experienced four economic downturns. Each time, a new growth driver has emerged afterward. After the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s, it was an export boom in the early 2000s; following the global financial crisis in 2008, it was increased infrastructure investment; the 2014–2015 downturn was followed by the property market boom. Looking ahead, we expect consumption and industrial upgrading to be the key factors that help to drive China’s next phase of economic growth.
Currently, China’s private consumption is less than 40% of gross domestic product, significantly below most other major economies. However, we think this could start to change. The Chinese government’s agenda has started to shift away from “hard infrastructure” to an emphasis more on “soft infrastructure.” That includes new urbanization, the social safety net, education, health care, and child‑care. These trends should be supportive of increasing consumption over the coming years.
Technology and industrial upgrades are another key driver, both domestically and in the global market. China already accounts for over 30% of global manufacturing output. The future is more about increasing value added than pure volume. The effect of China’s industrial upgrade is well reflected in its export mix. China’s processing trade had declined over the past decade, but the ordinary trade, which carries much higher value added, more than doubled during the period.
As of August 31, 2024.
Sources: World Bank, NBS, BEA, CAO, Deutsche Bundesbank, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (India), Haver Analytics, CEIC, Citi Research.
As of September 30, 2024.
Processing trade is where materials and components to be used in export production are imported into China under bonded status, free of tax.
Ordinary trade = Chinese exports that are part of processing trade.
Made in China 2025 is a government policy to increase the Chinese‑domestic content of core products to 40 percent by 2020 and 70 percent by 2025.
Sources: Wind, China Customs, Bernstein Research.
After the PBOC’s announcement on September 24, the MSCI China Index rallied by over 30% in the following two weeks. This was followed by a 10% pullback when the market reopened on October 8 after China’s weeklong national holiday. We think economic improvement and a corporate earnings inflection are probably still two to three quarters away. The market currently is mostly trading on sentiment and policy expectations. Despite near‑term volatility, we see an improving outlook and attractive valuation. We are constructive on the outlook for Chinese equities over the next two to three years.
With the recent market recovery, MSCI China’s price/earnings ratio has rerated to near its 20‑year average but remains at a 20% discount to emerging markets ex‑China (Figure 6). After this broad‑based rerating, we think corporate fundamentals will be the key performance drivers going forward. From a bottom‑up perspective, we can continue to find compelling investment opportunities in China’s deep, stock market.
As of October 11, 2024.
SD= Standard deviation. P/E= Price‑to‑Earnings, using 12 month forward earnings. Actual outcomes may differ materially from estimates.
Sources: FactSet, MSCI, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
After three and a half years of market downturn and underperformance of growth stocks, select high‑quality growth stocks in China are trading at an attractive price. We continue to like our holdings in online recruiting, shopping malls, and hotel chains. These are scalable businesses with high earnings growth potential over the next few years. We believe they also stand to benefit from an improving macro outlook.
Another fertile hunting ground is industrial businesses with strong competitiveness and a favorable industry cycle. Examples include rail equipment, power grid upgrade, shipbuilding, and construction machinery. We expect these businesses to see accelerating earnings growth and improving returns over the coming quarters, with or without additional policy stimulus.
There are increasing opportunities for rising shareholder returns. In select industries, as businesses mature they enter the “harvest stage” and become highly cash generative. We look for Chinese companies with a combination of rising cash flow, disciplined capital allocation, and shareholder‑friendly mindset. We have found that combination in our holdings of telecom tower, outdoor media, and delivery companies.
China’s economic policy has reached the turning point from deleveraging to growth. This increased policy support could stabilize the economy by effectively addressing the property sector and local debt issues. We believe the transition to consumption and industrial upgrading will, over time, drive the next phase of China’s economic growth. We continue to find compelling opportunities in Chinese equities. We aim to build a balanced fund that will benefit from China’s economic transition in the coming years.
Wenli Zheng is the portfolio manager of the China Evolution Equity Strategy in the Global Equity Division. He also co-manages the Greater China portfolio of the International Small-Cap Equity Strategy. Wenli is a vice president of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Hong Kong Limited.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Financial Terms: For a Glossary of financial terms that may have been used in this material, please go to: www.troweprice.com/en/us/glossary
Additional Disclosures
Bloomberg Finance L.P. “Bloomberg®” and the Bloomberg Indices are service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates, including Bloomberg Index Services Limited (“BISL”), the administrator of the index (collectively, “Bloomberg”) and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by T. Rowe Price. Bloomberg is not affiliated with T. Rowe Price, and Bloomberg does not approve, endorse, review, or recommend this Product. Bloomberg does not guarantee the timeliness, accurateness, or completeness of any data or information relating to this product.
MSCI. MSCI and its affiliates and third party sources and providers (collectively, “MSCI”) makes no express or implied warranties or representations nd shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for ther indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI. Historical MSCI data and analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance analysis, forecast or prediction. None of the MSCI data is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such.
Important Information
Call 1‑800‑225‑5132 to request a prospectus or summary prospectus; each includes investment objectives, risks, fees, expenses, and other information you should read and consider carefully before investing.
This material is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be investment advice or a recommendation to take any particular investment action.
The views contained herein are those of the authors as of November 2024 and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price associates.
This information is not intended to reflect a current or past recommendation concerning investments, investment strategies, or account types, advice of any kind, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities or investment services. The opinions and commentary provided do not take into account the investment objectives or financial situation of any particular investor or class of investor. Please consider your own circumstances before making an investment decision.
Information contained herein is based upon sources we consider to be reliable; we do not, however, guarantee its accuracy. Actual future outcomes may differ materially from any estimates or forward‑looking statements provided.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. All investments are subject to market risk, including the possible loss of principal. International investments can be riskier than U.S. investments due to the adverse effects of currency exchange rates, differences in market structure and liquidity, as well as specific country, regional, and economic developments. These risks are generally greater for investments in emerging markets. All charts and tables are shown for illustrative purposes only.
T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., distributor.
© 2024 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, and the Bighorn Sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.