October 2024, From the Field
Interest rates and expectations about the next Federal Reserve decision are always important topics in our Portfolio Construction Solutions team’s discussion with financial advisors. In September 2024, the Fed cut the federal funds rate by 50 bps (one basis point is equal to 0.01%) after being on pause for more than a year, signaling a regime change. In this portfolio construction insight, we’ll take a look at how previous rate-cutting regimes impacted the performance of stocks, bonds, and cash. Our goal is to arm you with the information to make informed decisions for you and your clients.
T. Rowe Price’s Multi-Asset Division recently published research on interest rate-cutting cycles, identifying 12 such regimes since January 1954 (Figure 1). Cycle duration has ranged from five months to 40 months, with the average regime lasting 16 months. A standard deviation of 11 months, however, suggests that there is a good deal of variability in cycle duration. In simple terms, about half of the cycles lasted one year or less, and about half lasted longer than one year. Twenty five percent of the cycles lasted two years or more. Importantly, interest rates fell by between 75 bps and 1,050 bps during these cycles, and the average decrease was 453 bps.
We evaluated the performance of U.S. large‑cap stocks, bonds, and cash over prior cycles (Figure 1). But before we discuss this performance, please keep in mind that there are only 12 cycles, and some are very short, especially if split in half. While no data covering past performance can be reliable indicators of future results, we believe the analysis can be informative.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Stocks = Ibbotson SBBI U.S. Large Stock; bonds = Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (from January 1976 to July 2024) and Ibbotson SBBI U.S. Intermediate-Term (5-Year) Government Bonds (from November 1957 to December 1975); cash = Ibbotson SBBI U.S. (30-Day) Treasury Bills.
* Using the Fed Funds Effective Rate.
† Measurement period excludes the month in which the first cut took place.
Sources: FactSet, Morningstar, and Federal Reserve Economic Database, analysis by T. Rowe Price.
Figure 2 further breaks down the asset class performance in each cycle into three time periods: The first half of the cycle, second half of the cycle, and the full cycle. In general, the hit rate (the percentage of instances a stated result is achieved) of positive returns for U.S. large‑cap stocks looked good across the full cycle and in the second half of the cycle. Stocks moved from a 50% to 75% success rate from the first half to the second half of prior cycles.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Stocks = Ibbotson SBBI U.S. Large Stock; bonds = Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (from January 1976 to July 2024) and Ibbotson SBBI U.S. Intermediate-Term (5-Year) Government Bonds (from November 1957 to December 1975); cash = Ibbotson SBBI U.S. (30-Day) Treasury Bills.
Sources: FactSet, Morningstar, and Federal Reserve Economic Database, analysis by T. Rowe Price.
Figure 3 suggests that U.S. large-cap stocks tended to underperform in the first half of a cutting cycle, with success ratios of 25% and 50% versus bonds and cash, respectively (success ratio refers to the percent of time that stocks outperformed other asset classes). In the second half of the cycle, however, stocks performed much better on a relative basis, with success ratios of 75% versus both bonds and cash. Over a full cycle, stocks had a 58% success ratio over bonds and 75% success ratio over cash.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Stocks = Ibbotson SBBI U.S. Large Stock; bonds = Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (from January 1976 to July 2024) and Ibbotson SBBI U.S. Intermediate-Term (5-Year) Government Bonds (from November 1957 to December 1975); cash = Ibbotson SBBI U.S. (30-Day) Treasury Bills.
Sources: FactSet, Morningstar, and Federal Reserve Economic Database, analysis by T. Rowe Price.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
* Measurement period excludes the month in which the first cut took place.
Stocks = Ibbotson SBBI U.S. Large Stock; bonds = Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (from January 1976 to July 2024) and Ibbotson SBBI U.S. Intermediate-Term (5-Year) Government Bonds (from November 1957 to December 1975); cash = Ibbotson SBBI U.S. (30-Day) Treasury Bills.
Sources: FactSet, Morningstar, and Federal Reserve Economic Database, analysis by T. Rowe Price.
In Figure 4, we looked at the average 12-month returns at different starting points: At the time of the first cut, three months after the first cut, and six months after the first cut. It’s clear that stocks tended to perform better on average the further removed they were from the first cut. Bonds performed best at the first rate cut and declined modestly in subsequent periods. Not surprisingly, cash declined the further in time we moved from the first rate cut.
Figure 5 shows the 12 month return of stocks, bonds, and cash following the first rate cut of the cycle. As shown, the three asset classes generally fared well over the 12 months following the initial rate cut, although there was a wide range of outcomes, particularly for stocks.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Stocks = Ibbotson SBBI U.S. Large Stock; bonds = Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (fromJanuary 1976 to July 2024 and Ibbotson SBBI U.S. Intermediate-Term (5-Year) Government Bonds (from November 1957 to December 1975);cash = Ibbotson SBBI U.S. (30-Day) Treasury Bills.
Sources: FactSet, Morningstar, and Federal Reserve Economic Database, analysis by T. Rowe Price.
At the start of the current cycle, the Fed is lowering interest rates with the economy still in pretty good shape. This is in contrast to most prior cycles, which typically began with declining GDP growth. Moreover, stock valuations are high, likely reflecting a relatively favorable economic environment. And while past performance is not indicative of future returns, our analysis suggests that investors could consider reallocating their portfolios for the new rate-cutting regime.
If you’re seeking information on ways to position your portfolios for a new interest rate regime, we can help. We work with financial professionals to find practical solutions for critical investment and practice challenges. Used independently or in combination, each component of our integrated suite of Portfolio Construction Solutions provides access to T. Rowe Price’s world‑class multi-asset expertise and global investment resources to address your portfolio construction needs.
Terry Davis is the director and manager of Investment Solutions for the Portfolio Construction Solutions Group. He is a vice president of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
Additional Disclosures
© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete, or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Bloomberg® and Bloomberg Indices are service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates, including Bloomberg Index Services Limited (“BISL”), the administrator of the index (collectively, “Bloomberg”) and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by T. Rowe Price. Bloomberg is not affiliated with T. Rowe Price, and Bloomberg does not approve, endorse, review, or recommend T. Rowe Price Products. Bloomberg does not guarantee the timeliness, accurateness, or completeness of any data or information relating to T. Rowe Price Products.
Important Information
Risks: All investments are subject to market risk, including the possible loss of principal. Fixed income securities are subject to credit risk, liquidity risk, call risk, and interest rate risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices generally fall. Diversification cannot assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market.
Past performance cannot guarantee future results. All charts and tables are shown for illustrative purposes only.
The views contained herein are those of authors as of October 2024 and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price associates. This material is provided for general and educational purposes only and not intended to provide legal, tax, or investment advice. This material does not provide recommendations concerning investments, investment strategies, or account types; it is not individualized to the needs of any specific investor and not intended to suggest any particular investment action is appropriate for you. T. Rowe Price group of companies, including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., and/or its affiliates, receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services.
Portfolio construction services discussed are available only to financial professionals and not to the retail public.
T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., Distributor. Art of Clean Up® and Asset Allocation Model Review are offered by T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. Model Construction is offered by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., are affiliated companies.
© 2024 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, and the Bighorn Sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.