The case for value
Reasonable valuations could provide an upside surprise.
March 2024, From the Field
The U.S. stock market has recently produced very strong returns in aggregate, narrowly led by the seven mega-cap stocks known as the “Magnificent Seven.” Driven by the strength of the Magnificent Seven, which accounted for more than 47% of the Russell 1000 Growth Index as of February 20, 2024, growth stocks have significantly outperformed value stocks.
This uneven market advance has many investors wondering if we should expect growth stock dominance to continue or if a broader market rally, led by value stocks, could be on the horizon.
One reason to be skeptical of continued growth stock dominance is the huge valuation gap that growth stocks currently enjoy over value stocks. As of February 20, the P/E of the Russell 1000 Growth Index was 12.2x higher than the P/E of the Russell 1000 Value index, which measures in the 86th percentile of all month-end observations since January 1998.
However, since this elevated valuation gap has persisted for some time, we should not
necessarily expect the gap to mean-revert quickly. But it does indicate that growth stocks currently enjoy high earnings growth expectations, while expectations for value are quite reasonable. Consequently, it will be much easier for value stocks to surprise markets to the upside going forward.
The stark difference in expectations is particularly noticeable at the sector level, where sentiment for financials and energy sectors are notably depressed while technology sentiment is meaningfully elevated. This can be illustrated by comparing each sector’s share of the S&P 500 on a market-cap basis versus on an earnings basis.
As of February 20, financials—which are heavily represented in the value index—accounted for 20% of the S&P 500’s earnings but only 13% of its market cap. Similarly, energy—another sector heavily tilted toward value—accounted for 8% of S&P 500 earnings but only 4% of the market cap. Meanwhile, information technology—which is extremely growth oriented—accounted for 19% of S&P 500 earnings but 30% of the market cap.
Both the financials and energy sectors face headwinds that could be fading over
the near to medium term. In the case of financials, a steepening yield curve
could drive profits higher if the Fed cuts short-term rates. In the case of energy, peaking oil rig productivity and/or further elevation of tensions in the Middle East could push oil prices higher.
Another potential tailwind for value relative to growth is higher real interest
rates. Real interest rates, defined as the rate of interest minus the rate of
inflation, were extremely low during the post-financial crisis period from
2008 to 2019, famously known as the “New Normal.” But an examination of
history reveals that the near-zero real rates of that period were actually
very abnormal. And the dynamics that held rates so low for so long—most
notably extremely accommodative monetary policy—appear unlikely to continue
going forward.
If real interest rates do, in fact, revert back to normal levels, it would mean
both bad news and good news for stocks overall but could favor value stocks.
The bad news is that stock valuations are generally lower when real rates are
high. We can see this dynamic at work by plotting the P/E ratios versus the
10-year real rate over that past 10 years. This reveals a fairly notable
negative correlation.
But the good news is that higher real rates are typically accompanied by higher
economic growth, which in turn should mean higher company earnings. So while
the P/E ratio may go down, it does not mean that stock prices need to go down
because the “E” could be moving higher. And this could be even better news
for value stocks because while P/Es have tended to fall when real rates have
been higher, they have tended to fall by much less than growth stock P/Es do.
There is also some good news for growth stocks. Excitement about artificial
intelligence has recently made growth stock valuations somewhat impervious to
the impacts of higher rates, as investors hold hope that the future earnings
boost from artificial intelligence could outweigh the impacts of a higher rate environment.
The bottom line is that while value stocks have trailed growth stocks considerably over the past year, there are reasons to believe this dynamic could shift going forward. As a result, our Asset Allocation Committee has recently moved to an overweight position in U.S. value equities.
Key Insights
- U.S. growth stocks have significantly outperformed value stocks over the past year, but we believe this dynamic could shift as near-term challenges fade.
- T. Rowe Price’s Asset Allocation Committee has moved to overweight U.S. value stocks, as earnings expectations appear to leave room for an upside surprise.
Written by
Tim Murray, CFA
Capital Markets Strategist Multi-Asset Division
Over the past year, U.S. growth stocks have significantly outperformed value stocks, driven by the so-called Magnificent Seven.[1]Given this uneven market advance, many investors may wonder if growth stock dominance will continue or if a broader market rally, led by value stocks, could be on the horizon.
Elevated valuations for U.S. growth stocks reflect high earnings growth expectations for the sector. More subdued earnings expectations for value stocks leave room for an upside surprise. This difference in expectations is particularly noticeable at the sector level (Figure 1).
Low expectations for financials and energy sectors
(Fig. 1) S&P 500 Index sector weights versus share of index earnings
Data represent the 12-month period ended February 20, 2024.
Past results are not a reliable indicator of future results. Actual outcomes may differ materially from forward estimates.
Sources: T. Rowe Price analysis using data from FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved. S&P 500 Index. GICS. See additional information.* The “Magnificent Seven” stocks are Apple, Alphabet, Amazon.com, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla. The specific securities identified and described are for informational purposes only and do not represent recommendations. Not representative of an actual investment. There is no assurance that an investment in any security was or will be profitable.
(Fig. 2) Real rate impact on stock valuations
Data represent the 10 years ended January 2024.
Past results are not a reliable indicator of future results. Actual outcomes may differ materially from estimates.
Sources: T. Rowe Price analysis using data from FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Bloomberg Finance L.P. and Russell Indexes. See additional information.NTM = next twelve months* The artificial intelligence excitement began in late 2022, with the launch of ChatGPT.
On a sector-weight basis, expectations for the extremely growth‑oriented information technology sector are meaningfully elevated relative to the tech’s share of S&P 500 Index earnings. Meanwhile, sentiment toward the financials and energy sectors—both heavily tilted toward value—is notably depressed.
Despite near-term challenges, a steepening yield curve could drive up profits in the financials sector if the Federal Reserve cuts short‑term rates. Peaking oil rig productivity and/or further elevated tensions in the Middle East could push oil prices higher, boosting energy earnings.
U.S. value stocks also could benefit from higher real (after inflation) interest rates. The near-zero real interest rates seen from 2008 to 2019—the post-global financial crisis period commonly referred to as the “New Normal”—were actually quite abnormal relative to historical norms, and a repeat of the extremely accommodative monetary policy that held rates so low for so long appears unlikely going forward.
While stock valuations, represented by price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios, have tended to fall when real rates are high, value stocks typically have fared better than growth stocks in such environments (Figure 2). Still, it is important to note that recent excitement about artificial intelligence has made U.S. growth stock valuations seemingly impervious to the impact of higher interest rates.
U.S. value stocks have trailed growth stocks considerably over the past year, and we believe this dynamic could shift. As a result, the Asset Allocation Committee recently moved to an overweight position in U.S. value equities.
From the field • Video
After the Fed pivot, what’s next?
With cooling expectations, investors wonder when and how far U.S. rates will fall in 2024.
[1] The “Magnificent Seven” are Apple, Alphabet, Amazon.com, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla.
Additional Disclosure
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
London Stock Exchange Group plc and its group undertakings (collectively, the “LSE Group”). © LSE Group 2024. All rights in the FTSE Russell indexes or data vest in the relevant LSE Group company which owns the index or the data. Neither LSE Group nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the indexes or data and no party may rely on any indexes or data contained in this communication. No further distribution of data from the LSE Group is permitted without the relevant LSE Group company’s express written consent. The LSE Group does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication
The S&P 500 Index is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, or its affiliates (“SPDJI”) and has been licensed for use by T. Rowe Price. Standard & Poor’s® and S&P® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a division of S&P Global (“S&P”);Dow Jones® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”); T. Rowe Price’s Products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by SPDJI, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates, and none of such parties make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product(s) nor do they have any liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of the S&P 500 Index.
T. Rowe Price uses the current MSCI/S&P Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) for sector and industry reporting. GICS was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc, (“MSCI”) and Standard & Poor’s, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“S&P”) and is licensed for use by T. Rowe Price. Neither MSCI, S&P nor any third party involved in making or compiling the GICS or any GICS classifications makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such standard or classification (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any or such standard or classification, Without limiting any or the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, S&P, any of their affiliates or any third party involved in making or compiling the GICS or any GICS classifications have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of the possibility of such damages.
Important Information
This material is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be investment advice or a recommendation to take any particular investment action.
The views contained herein are those of the authors as of March 2024 and are subject to change without notice; these views may differ from those of other T. Rowe Price associates.
This information is not intended to reflect a current or past recommendation concerning investments, investment strategies, or account types, advice of any kind, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities or investment services. The opinions and commentary provided do not take into account the investment objectives or financial situation of any particular investor or class of investor. Please consider your own circumstances before making an investment decision.
Information contained herein is based upon sources we consider to be reliable; we do not, however, guarantee its accuracy. Actual outcomes may differ materially from any forward‑looking statements made.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. All investments are subject to market risk, including the possible loss of principal. The value approach to investing carries the risk that the market will not recognize a security’s intrinsic value for a long time or that a stock judged to be undervalued may actually be appropriately priced. All charts and tables are shown for illustrative purposes only.
T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., distributor, and T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., investment adviser.
© 2024 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. ROWE PRICE, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, and the Bighorn Sheep design are, collectively and/or apart, trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
ID0006823 (03/2024)
202403-3486864